Baltbear on Finance markets are like marshmallows

Rolling Stone, which has almost redeemed itself by paying attention to the economy for a change, had a recent article about the insiders from goldman-sachs taking a large bite out of the future faith and cresit of the government of the usa. sadly enough, as part of its maintaining its perpetual whininess, it describes some evil plot in which people who cannot put “credit default swap” into an intelligible sentence are being picked on by people who can.
my answer to those who complain that they do know what a toxic debenture is? learn or shut up. if people can be bothered to “research” the love lives of stevie nicks and lindsey buckingham, they can learn to keep track of how the economy works.

When the prudent speculator is testing a story stock, it is usually quite useful to look for so-called stock boards, like
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/mb/BTIM.OB
where the legitimacy of the views being put forth by present holders can be tested.
another might be:
http://moneycentral.msn.com/community/message/topicsandtickers.asp?Symbol=BTIM
o. look. msn doesn’t bother with stocks kicked off the national exchanges and lurking around on bulletin boards.
john f. kennedy once said about lobbyists of varying kinds, “where there is smoke there is a smoke machine.”
on penny stocks there is an entire smoke industry (which oddly enough, does not ave an naics number). a way to hunt down the smoke from the fire is to look in filings for “investment services” being documented with transfers of stock or cash (sometimes both) t create “buzz.” that buzz will first go to preferred suckers on the phone, then to less preferred subscribers to “investment letters” and once that’s in place, then to whatever stock board or chat room somebody can post to.
a clue to such posters is that they generally refer to any discussion of th story or the fundamentals  as “paid bashing” by “evil shorts” etc.
the saddest cases happen when somebody who thinks equities trading is like football fandom becomes a brain dead cheerleader for the story, and continually hhypes about some future price, like..5, or 12..or “when the puppy is on the nasdaq national market” and offers that as the only dd he has. thirty years ago, when penn state et al were starting the snowball rolling, fleetwood mac sang about breaking a chain,  a story believed without due diligence.

Posted under business

someone suggested to me that i was paid to bash biotime (btim.ob). i replied that the paid bashing on the net was being done by steven seinberg, chief financial officer (cfo) of biotime, in posts to the securities and exchange commission.  it is of interest possibly to note that  some anonymous person publicly stated a day or 4 ago that biotime was about to receive a $5mm grant.  That’s the kind of world where bucket shops and boiler rooms thrive: people doing honest analysis must be “paid bashers” while people doing mindless and dishonest cheerleading to protect teir positions are considered “loyal shareholders.”
here’s an example f what i mean:

the 8k filed on 0417 describing what happened on 0415:

The maturity date of our Revolving Line of Credit has been extended to December 1, 2009 with respect to $2,669,282 in principal amount of loans. (a revolving line of credit for $2.669mm got a new date, 7 1/2 month away.)

“We repaid $223,834 of principal and accrued interest on loans that matured on April 15, 2009 and were not extended.
(some part of the credit line was shut off, and paid out. does biotime bother to be honest enough to say which part?)

” In addition, certain lenders exercised their right to exchange $572,404 of principal and accrued interest on loans for an aggregate of 473,131 of our common shares.”
Does biotime bother to say how much of the $572k was principal and how much interest?  some loans were at 12%.
if one speculates that 12% is the figure, and 1 year the time period, then the lender lost oportunity for 1 year on apx $511k, and then was traded for 473k shares, for a basis of 1 3/32 ish…. ($1.08).
And actually, its worse than that. How??
becuase, to use a term from aother world, biotime had to pay vigourish on the loan. it was forced to give for free  91,526 shares, based on a 6% iterest rate, to the lenders.
91,526 is therefore 6% of what? 6% of the $2mm comes to $160,156. and that converts to 91,256 shares how? on a basis of 1 3/4 ($1.75 a share).
does this sound like an invented number?
biotime identifies this number:
“Promissory notes that were exchangeable for our common shares at a price of $1.50 and Embryome Sciences common stock at $2.50 until April 15, 2009, may now be exchanged for our common shares at $1.75 per share”
and i offer that as evidence of the soundness of this analysis.

a coupl;e of days later 14ds were filed with the sec, and the movement from the dtc to the recipients had to cross the tape. it crossed it at prevailing prices f the moment, cuasing some to see a “rally” which they traded into and or out of.
However, the idea that the buyers actually paid anything more than is stated above is a fiction.
Biotime would, imho, have a moral and fiduciary duty to identify it as a fiction.
Did it?
ask the reporters who called (or were they called??) what the ceo, dr michael west said.
then the prudent speculator has a metric for the integrity of the “science” of biotime.

the “good news” in this 8 k is that the exchange price isn;t 16 cents.
the hoest news is that this is the 5th amendment to a credit agreement that is nowhere near being retired, and there is no evidence in the 10k as to how it ever will be.
bottom line?
people buying biotime stock are not buying equity in biotime, bcuase there is no equity except patents 1/2 way thru their life.  they are supporting the acquisition of biotime by al kingsley and neal bradshear, who are paying next to nothing for it.

” We may borrow up to an additional $830,718 under our revolving line of credit if we elect to do so and are able to obtain additional loan commitments from our current lender or from new lenders.”

notice how bio time cannot, unnder thee covenenants borrow $1 mm from somebody new.
notice how biotime evidently needs permission from the current creditors to eve look for financing, up to the $830 mark.

Posted under business