Baltbear on Finance markets are like marshmallows

i rceived an email a couple ago asking, basedon a conversation elsewhere, what i meant by ” shake and bake” –was i referencing talladega nights?

nope. the termpredates that movie by a decade.
let’s explain:
so, mm’s see a surge tomorrow on ticker abcd:nasd.nm. how? because sallimay, the daughter of the ceo told her sorority sister, the daughter of the hedge fund manager, that she was going to shopping for a new beemer on saturday.
(don;t think that happens? i once had an associate who was chief of security for a rather expensive private college, who did his most successul trades based on whether visiting parents, who were all ceo/cfo/coo/etc types were smiling or somber whe they greeted their daughters.)
the mm can see, on his screen that there are a total of 100k shares hanging in the float wth limit sells, and stop loss orders.
let’s say abcd is trading at 15, and there are stops in all the way down to 10. a stop loss at 13 5/8 will execute at 8, if that’s the clear (the “market”), and there’s a buyer. so.. he offers to buy 80k @ 8, and sell 1k at 12, 1k at 11, 1k @ 10, 1k @ 8 1/16. somebody elsewhere (like me) has a limit buy, 1k @ 8 1/8.
as soon as the “enter” button gets hit, the domios fall, and all 100k of stop losses kick in, looking for a buyer. why? becuase that 1k @ 8 1/15 sell hit my buy 1k @ 8 1/8.
the mm is now short 1k, but, if there are not limit buys in for 99k more between 8 1/8 and 13 5/8, all those stop losses are going to pour into the mm’s account.
and 2 minures later the whole thing is over.
and that’s shake and bake.
think things like that never happen? tat the markets are not that corrupt? that hedger fnd managers are your freinds? that ur broker is looking out for you? that that hypster on a stock board cares about the company? that the regulators will prevent this?
ok. keep beleiving it. or else note:

as stp loss order kick in and the machines talk to themselves

then read the chage in “analysts” lol…”sentiment” today.

Posted under business

someone suggested to me that i was paid to bash biotime (btim.ob). i replied that the paid bashing on the net was being done by steven seinberg, chief financial officer (cfo) of biotime, in posts to the securities and exchange commission.  it is of interest possibly to note that  some anonymous person publicly stated a day or 4 ago that biotime was about to receive a $5mm grant.  That’s the kind of world where bucket shops and boiler rooms thrive: people doing honest analysis must be “paid bashers” while people doing mindless and dishonest cheerleading to protect teir positions are considered “loyal shareholders.”
here’s an example f what i mean:

the 8k filed on 0417 describing what happened on 0415:

The maturity date of our Revolving Line of Credit has been extended to December 1, 2009 with respect to $2,669,282 in principal amount of loans. (a revolving line of credit for $2.669mm got a new date, 7 1/2 month away.)

“We repaid $223,834 of principal and accrued interest on loans that matured on April 15, 2009 and were not extended.
(some part of the credit line was shut off, and paid out. does biotime bother to be honest enough to say which part?)

” In addition, certain lenders exercised their right to exchange $572,404 of principal and accrued interest on loans for an aggregate of 473,131 of our common shares.”
Does biotime bother to say how much of the $572k was principal and how much interest?  some loans were at 12%.
if one speculates that 12% is the figure, and 1 year the time period, then the lender lost oportunity for 1 year on apx $511k, and then was traded for 473k shares, for a basis of 1 3/32 ish…. ($1.08).
And actually, its worse than that. How??
becuase, to use a term from aother world, biotime had to pay vigourish on the loan. it was forced to give for free  91,526 shares, based on a 6% iterest rate, to the lenders.
91,526 is therefore 6% of what? 6% of the $2mm comes to $160,156. and that converts to 91,256 shares how? on a basis of 1 3/4 ($1.75 a share).
does this sound like an invented number?
biotime identifies this number:
“Promissory notes that were exchangeable for our common shares at a price of $1.50 and Embryome Sciences common stock at $2.50 until April 15, 2009, may now be exchanged for our common shares at $1.75 per share”
and i offer that as evidence of the soundness of this analysis.

a coupl;e of days later 14ds were filed with the sec, and the movement from the dtc to the recipients had to cross the tape. it crossed it at prevailing prices f the moment, cuasing some to see a “rally” which they traded into and or out of.
However, the idea that the buyers actually paid anything more than is stated above is a fiction.
Biotime would, imho, have a moral and fiduciary duty to identify it as a fiction.
Did it?
ask the reporters who called (or were they called??) what the ceo, dr michael west said.
then the prudent speculator has a metric for the integrity of the “science” of biotime.

the “good news” in this 8 k is that the exchange price isn;t 16 cents.
the hoest news is that this is the 5th amendment to a credit agreement that is nowhere near being retired, and there is no evidence in the 10k as to how it ever will be.
bottom line?
people buying biotime stock are not buying equity in biotime, bcuase there is no equity except patents 1/2 way thru their life.  they are supporting the acquisition of biotime by al kingsley and neal bradshear, who are paying next to nothing for it.

” We may borrow up to an additional $830,718 under our revolving line of credit if we elect to do so and are able to obtain additional loan commitments from our current lender or from new lenders.”

notice how bio time cannot, unnder thee covenenants borrow $1 mm from somebody new.
notice how biotime evidently needs permission from the current creditors to eve look for financing, up to the $830 mark.

Posted under business