Over and over, most recently from matt taiibi in rolling stone, and from countless others on internet stock boards, there is a resurgence of the fiction of “illegal naked shorting.”
First off, things regarding the mkts are regulated by the sec, which is a division of the federal reserve, which occasionally thru its chair reports to congress, which passes laws.
but, until e-bay starts reworking the constitution, (after meg whitman goes from california governor to ceo of usa inc,) and a constitutional convention is done through google buzz, “legal” and “illegal” have nothing to do with shorting of any kind. “scummy” “duplicitous” “screwing with walres law with the logical result”…yes. and? “well it oughta be” and other forms of jousting at windmills have but one answer: “go buy your own congressmen and get ‘er done.”
in addition, exchanges pass rules concerning their members and traffic that may be tighter than the actual regulations set by the sec.
example? sally is a secretary for greengobble partners, which is busy doing a long slow take under (at shareholder expense… ok..that’s so “well, duh” it shouldn’t be stated) of buymetimesickles, inc. while running the copyer, she notices that buymetime is putting out an 8k, restating the 4th quarter of 09, as if the 4th 1/4 was a a separate event from the 4th 1/4 discussed in a 10k filed 3 weeks earlier, and announcing 1st 1/4 results for 2010 19 days before the 1/4 is over–unless buymetime has changed its calendar–which of course it has done before. further, the 8k states that a previously announced discount on warrant execution hasn’t really, well, yaknow…happened. cuase somebody “forgot” or something, to register it, after filing an 8k stating it was a done deal, cause buymetime wants to siphon corporate funds into an inhouse shell corp, one of 2 it has created.
sally tells this to bob, the limo driver for larry the lion. bob mentions it to larry while on the way to a brothel on the upper east side run by a dutch immigrant, who will later call her broker and tell him to short the puppy if it spikes. oddly, the open will have a 10% upsurge, 5 - 5 1/2, possibly because greengerbils llc on lasalle st in chicago (run by the son of greengobbles sr partner) is doing a placement to his private clients of some buymetime treasury stock issued in april, and approved by the shareholders in october. since the chart shows 5 1/2 as the shorts’ reasonable nibbling point, and any kind of f/a shows a reasonable price <2, and hitting 5 1/2 and covering 5ish is an easy 3/8 - 1/2 in less than a month, thereby yeilding >100% apr, being troubled with a “locate” is not really an issue. especially if the clearing house also is the owner of a million or so wts.
insider trading? yup. becuase sally has a “fiduciary duty” not to mention this to bob until the “press release” stating that the 8k will be filed some time later is “issued” by having somebody at buymetime inc, hit the internet for “free press releases” and place a few.
illegal? if it could evvver be hunted down (and fans of spiro agnew or raymond donovan will recall that it can be hunted down) there’s a 50/50 chance someby will call it illegal to keep the profit, if it came from using tax payers money (as fans of spiro agnew and raymond donovan will recall). if >sally< traded it, her action is a violation of sec rules. if she >lied< about it, that’s a felony (as fans of martha stuart will recall).
now, if somebody at phonypressrelease’r'us.com has a server side script set (based on past results) such that whenever buymetime, inc opens their account to prime the pump his skype account starts dialling his broker in frankfort, then you would have an exchange violation on nasdaq. (on amex, it probably gets u offered a job as a floor runner.) however, by sec rules, it’s >not< insider trading.
“regulations” do not make things legal or illegal…. the idea of “illegal naked shorting” is a head game played by stock promoters.
was i referring to any given “real” ticker in the above examples? regular visitors to this corner will hear the bell ringing.
a day or 2 ago a number of distressed financial stocks rallyed hard on the rumour—which the sec promptly denied, but nobody cared—that there was gonnna be a rule stopping all this blahblahblah…
i often find it uttterly amasing and laffable that people won’t bet $5 on a rugby game becuase they don’t know the rules, teams, etc…but will bet their family’s wealth on a sport where they are equallly ignorant of the rules, teams, players, etc…for no other reason than when the players suit up they are wearing uniforms by allen flusser.
i am occasionallly totallly non-plussed when a matt taibbi (who can explain a default credit swap) pretends to not know what a “put” is, or tries to argue that gs’ effort to bail out housing with trading profits from oil, and bail out the fed res’ ability to bail out banks by buying notes that are so derivative as to be intangibles is seen as some “evil plot”.
i am occasionally totally disgruntled when stock board posters, hypers, bucket shops, and the running dogs of the greengobble partners of this world tell people to keep buying becuase all the chicanery is “going to be investigated any day now.”
that will of course happen the day after they start serving high tea on the playing field whenever a rugby player hits the dirt.
Posted under business
This post was written by admin on March 13, 2010


